<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blaser Mills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:03:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Parental child abduction cases – Japan’s new pilot scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/parental-child-abduction-cases-japans-new-pilot-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/parental-child-abduction-cases-japans-new-pilot-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental child abduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new pilot scheme is being launched in Japan to assist those involved in the specific case of a parental child abduction where the child is taken to Japan.
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In any case involving a foreign jurisdiction, it is important to understand the law and procedures followed in that jurisdiction to be able to take appropriate steps.</strong> Having been fortunate enough to visit Japan recently, the writer appreciates the difficulties which may well arise in dealing with a legal matter without some knowledge of the Japanese language, let alone its legal system.</p>
<p>A new pilot scheme is being launched in Japan which Reunite, the UK based charity which deals with international parental child abduction, has reported will serve to assist those involved in the specific case of a parental child abduction where the child is taken to Japan and the other parent resides outside of Japan.</p>
<p>Although the scheme will not provide advice on individual cases, it will advise the child’s parent how to navigate through the Japanese legal system, offering up to an hour of advice given by a lawyer, who speaks both English and Japanese, on Japanese family law, family court proceedings and other aspects of the Japanese legal framework.</p>
<p>Charges for the international call to the parent by the lawyer will be paid by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.</p>
<p>Further details and contact email can be found at the Minisitry of Foreign Affairs of Japan website here: <a href="http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/page3e_000019.html">http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/page3e_000019.html</a></p>
<p>For further information on child abduction issues and for advice, please contact our Family team – <a href="mailto:family@blasermills.co.uk">family@blasermills.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/parental-child-abduction-cases-japans-new-pilot-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asbestos related injury reforms</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/asbestos-related-injury-reforms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/asbestos-related-injury-reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesothelioma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mesothelioma Bill aims to create a payment scheme for people with the disease where no liable employer or insurer can be traced.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Mesothelioma Bill – announced in the recent Queen’s Speech – aims to create a payment scheme for people with the disease where no liable employer or insurer can be traced.</strong></p>
<p>If enacted, a fixed-costs claims process will aim to pay out in three to five months in contrast to the under three months where an employer or insurer is known. Under the scheme, from July 2014 anyone in the UK diagnosed with mesothelioma after 25 July 2012 will be able to make a claim. The scheme will be funded by a levy on insurers of employers.</p>
<p>The Association of British Insurers director general, Otto Thoresen, has welcomed the Bill and said: “Mesothelioma is a devastating disease which has a terrible impact on sufferers and their families. The insurance industry wants to do all it can to help sufferers and has worked with the government on this package of measures that will deliver help to claimants much faster, including to those who would otherwise go uncompensated.”</p>
<p>However, the details of the scheme have been criticised by certain claimant personal injury lawyers because it will apply only to mesothelioma and will not cater for other asbestos related illness such as lung cancer. It has also been estimated that settlements under the scheme would be 30% lower than the average compensation received currently, potentially leaving mesothelioma sufferers them thousands of pounds out of pocket.</p>
<p>For further information please contact our <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-life/personal-injury/">Personal Injury team</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/asbestos-related-injury-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buy-back of employee shares simplified</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/buy-back-of-employee-shares-simplified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/buy-back-of-employee-shares-simplified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company & Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The process of buying back shares from employees on termination of employment has been made more straightforward for an employer]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The process of buying back shares from employees on termination of employment has been made more straightforward for an employer under new regulations which came into force on 30<sup>th</sup> April 2013.</strong></p>
<p>These include:</p>
<ul>
<li>allowing a private limited company to pay for its shares by instalments;</li>
<li>allowing a private limited company to buy back its own shares using cash (where it is authorised to do so by its articles of association) up to certain limits;</li>
<li>allowing off-market share buybacks to be authorised by ordinary resolution;</li>
<li>allow a company to make multiple off-market purchases of its own shares where such off-market purchases have been approved by a single ordinary resolution;</li>
<li>setting out the requirements under which a company may finance a share buyback out of capital; and</li>
<li>allowing a company limited by shares to hold its own shares in treasury and to deal with such shares as treasury shares (including any shares bought back with cash).</li>
</ul>
<p>The issue of share buybacks has additional significance because of legislation due to come into force later this year which will <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/employment-law-rights-for-shares/">allow employees to contract out of certain employment rights in exchange for shares </a>in the employer company.</p>
<p>Please contact our <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-business/company-and-commercial/">Company &amp; Commercial</a> team for further advice or information at <a href="mailto:commercial@blasermills.co.uk">commercial@blasermills.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/buy-back-of-employee-shares-simplified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does your Will contain a Discretionary Trust?</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/does-your-will-contain-a-discretionary-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/does-your-will-contain-a-discretionary-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inheritance Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In many circumstances the inclusion of a nil-rate band discretionary trust in your Will is unnecessary]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>Before 9<sup>th</sup> October 2007, many people were advised to make Wills incorporating a nil-rate band discretionary trust to save Inheritance Tax. However, because of legislation introducing the transferrable nil rate band, in many circumstances the inclusion of such a complex trust in Wills is no longer necessary.</strong></p>
<p>Inheritance tax (IHT) is generally charged at 40% on any sum by which a deceased&#8217;s estate exceeds £325,000.00 (the “nil rate band”) subject to the availability of exemptions and reliefs. The most significant exemption is the “spouse exemption” whereby gifts to a spouse are exempt from IHT provided the surviving spouse is domiciled in the United Kingdom.</p>
<p>Since 9<sup>th</sup> October 2007, it has been possible for spouses and civil partners to transfer any part of the inheritance tax nil-rate band allowance that was not used when the first spouse or civil partner died, to their surviving spouse or civil partner for use on their death.</p>
<p>Where a valid claim to transfer an unused nil-rate band is made, the nil-rate band that is available when the surviving spouse or civil partner dies will be increased by the unused proportion of the nil-rate band on the first death. For example, if at the time of the first death the nil-rate band was £300,000 and everything passed to the surviving spouse, then 100% of the nil-rate band will have been unused. If the nil-rate band when the surviving spouse dies is £325,000 then that would be increased by 100% to £650,000.</p>
<p>The amount of the nil-rate band that can be transferred does not depend on the value of the estate of the first spouse or civil partner to die. Whatever proportion of the nil-rate band is unused on the first death is available for transfer to the surviving spouse.</p>
<p>If your existing Will contains a nil-rate band discretionary trust, then by changing your Will now you will be able to simplify your affairs and avoid the additional paperwork, complexity and costs that would arise in the event of your death. You would also avoid a three month delay (from the date of your death) which would by necessity arise, if the trust is to be dissolved and advantage taken of the new rules.</p>
<p>If you think your Will may contain a nil-rate band discretionary trust, or if you would like to discuss Inheritance Tax, please contact our <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-life/wills-probate-and-tax-planning/">Wills, Probate and Tax Planning team</a>.<b></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/does-your-will-contain-a-discretionary-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defamation Act 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/defamation-act-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/defamation-act-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Act aims to ensure that a fair balance is struck between the right to freedom of expression and the protection of reputation ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Defamation Bill finally received Royal Assent on 25th April 2013, nearly three years after its introduction.</strong></p>
<p>The aim of the Act is to reform the law of defamation to ensure that a fair balance is struck between the right to freedom of expression and the protection of reputation . The Act makes a number of substantive changes to the law of defamation, but is not designed to codify the law into a single statute.</p>
<p>One of the most significant changes is the introduction of a requirement for a claimant to show that they have suffered serious harm before suing for defamation.</p>
<p>Furthermore, corporate bodies (bodies which trade for profit) must now show that the defamatory statement has caused or is likely to cause serious financial loss before being allowed to sue. This does not mean that a company will have to show actual financial losses but it will have to demonstrate that the defamatory statement is likely to cause a financial loss and that the loss is likely to be serious.</p>
<p>It is anticipated that this additional requirement on companies will prevent the flexing of corporate muscles by using the threat of libel action to silence critics.</p>
<p>The Act is expected to come into force later this year.</p>
<p>For further information and advice please contact us at <a href="mailto:commercial@blasermills.co.uk">commercial@blasermills.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/defamation-act-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International family dispute cases are increasing</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/international-family-dispute-cases-are-increasing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/international-family-dispute-cases-are-increasing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 08:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of cross-border family legal disputes where a UK Court intervenes has increased 10-fold in the last decade.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The recently published Annual Report of the Office of the Head of International Family Justice (IFJ) reveals that the number of cross-border family legal disputes where a UK Court intervenes has increased 10-fold in the last decade and more than doubled in two years.</strong></p>
<p>In the report preface, Lord Justice Thorpe, Head of International Family Justice for England and Wales, partially attributes the rise to the growing number of families where parents are of different nationalities and points to the growing numbers of children born to foreign parents. The report documents the growing body of international law and agreements needed to resolve these cases. There are no published figures for the growth in international litigation overall.</p>
<p>Cross-border disputes involving children can be complex to manage and resolve and regularly exceptionally difficult from a practical and emotional perspective for either parent. The IFJ functions as a centre of expertise and a help desk for Courts and legal advisers in UK or abroad who have seen their cases stalled and delayed because 2 countries&#8217; legal systems are involved and when international conventions guaranteeing children&#8217;s rights are being ignored by overseas courts.</p>
<p>The report refers to cases in which the IFJ has intervened, for example, where a mother who had taken her children to France to prevent them from being taken into care and the children were found living on a waterlogged caravan site and not attending school. In another case, the IFJ obtained the personal assurance of the Cypriot Attorney General that a woman agreeing to return from Britain to Cyprus with her child would not be prosecuted by the Cypriot authorities.</p>
<p>Please contact our <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-life/family-services/">Family Law team </a>for further information and advice on cross-border family disputes – <a href="mailto:family@blasermills.co.uk">family@blasermills.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/international-family-dispute-cases-are-increasing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queen&#8217;s Speech 2013: implications for businesses</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/queens-speech-2013-implications-for-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/queens-speech-2013-implications-for-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 12:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company & Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Included in the Queen’s Speech were plans to introduce various measures which will impact businesses.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Queen has announced the government&#8217;s legislative programme for the next Parliamentary session during the Queen&#8217;s Speech to the Houses of Parliament on 8th May 2013.</strong></p>
<p>Included in the Queen’s Speech were plans to introduce various measures which will impact <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-business/employment-law/">employment law</a>, such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>changes to national insurance contributions, including offering businesses an &#8220;employment allowance&#8221; of £2,000 to reduce their national insurance contributions bill;</li>
<li>changes to immigration law which seek seeking to tighten up controls on illegal immigrants; and</li>
<li>plans to remove the power for employment tribunals to make wider recommendations in successful discrimination claims under the Equality Act 2010.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition the Queen&#8217;s Speech outlined plans to reform the landscape of consumer law in the UK. The Draft Consumer Rights Bill will reform the rules on unfair terms, goods, services and digital content, misleading and aggressive practices, and the powers of enforcement bodies. It is also likely to include reform of consumer collective actions for anti-competitive behaviour.</p>
<p>Please contact our <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-business/">Commercial &amp; Employment team </a>for further advice and information – <a href="mailto:commercial@blasermills.co.uk">commercial@blasermills.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/queens-speech-2013-implications-for-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefit Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/benefit-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/benefit-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 11:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prosecutions for benefit fraud have risen some 40% in the last 3 years.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Prosecutions for benefit fraud are on the increase and may in part be due to additional powers given to Local Authorities last year to enable them better access to personal information for investigators to gather evidence of fraud.</strong></p>
<p>Figures from the Department for Work and Pensions show almost 10,000 people were convicted of benefit fraud during the last financial year. This compares to 7,040 convictions during the same period in 2009-2010, which is the equivalent of a 40 per cent rise.</p>
<p>Alternatives to a court prosecution are also on the rise, with administrative penalties almost doubling in number from the previous financial year.  An administrative penalty is similar to a police caution in that it will stay on the Local Authorities record should a subsequent fraud be committed.  In addition the offender is required to re-pay the amount of benefits overpaid as a result of the fraud together with a 30% uplift on that sum.</p>
<p>We would advise that anyone suspected of benefit fraud seek advice from a member of our <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-life/criminal-defence/">criminal defence department </a>as soon as possible.  This will help to ensure that any alternatives to a court prosecution are explored. Further it is often the case that investigators seek information from suspected offenders prior to any formal interview or prosecution and it is important that you seek legal advice on the disclosure of such information in advance.</p>
<p>If you have been invited for an interview with the Local Authority or Department for Work &amp; Pensions regarding an allegation of benefit fraud, you are entitled to have legal representation there, in the same way as with a Police interview and may also be entitled to Legal Aid for that, dependent on your circumstances.</p>
<p>Alternatively, if you have received a summons to attend Court, or have already been interviewed and are awaiting a decision as to how your case will be dealt with, please contact our <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-life/criminal-defence/">criminal defence department </a>for further information as to how we can help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/benefit-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New property forms</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/new-property-forms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/new-property-forms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 09:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Law Society has produced updated property forms designed to make buying and selling homes quicker and easier.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>After a two year consultation process, the Law Society has now published the long awaited, updated Property Information Form (TA6) and Fitting and Contents Form (TA10). The forms are due to be circulated by law firms nationwide later this month. </strong></p>
<p>The forms are designed to provide answers to commonly asked questions at the outset of the transaction, in an attempt to reduce the number of additional enquiries subsequently raised by the buyer’s solicitor which can cause delay. Any subsequent enquiries raised should be limited to those not already dealt with in the forms and specific to the paperwork provided and search results obtained. Members of the Conveyancing Quality Scheme, such as ourselves, will be bound to use the new forms on all new transactions and it is hoped that this will promote greater transparency and uniformity amongst firms.</p>
<p>The Fitting and Contents Form has introduced a more detailed tick box approach which enables the seller to advise whether various items are included, excluded or confirm that there are none at the property. The seller is now required to tick the appropriate box for each item rather than insert a tick, cross or indeed leave the box blank if the item did not exist as was the case in the old forms.</p>
<p>The Property Information Form has also been amended to include some frequently asked additional questions, particularly at section 14.4 of the Form which asks the seller to confirm that all rubbish will be removed from the property on completion, all keys for windows and doors will be handed over to the estate agent or left at the property and reasonable care will be taken when removing items from the property. The form has also expanded on existing questions where further information was commonly required. For example, the seller is now asked to specify the nature of any building works carried out at the property and the year that the works were undertaken. They are also asked to supply copies of the relevant planning consent and building control paperwork or explain why the works were exempt. With many additional enquiries relating to past development of the property, it will be interesting to see whether sellers do indeed provide the documentation requested at the outset without further enquiries needing to be raised.</p>
<p>Please do not hesitate to contact our <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-life/residential-property/">Residential Property team </a>if you would like to learn more, or would like to discuss your moving requirements with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/new-property-forms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/enterprise-and-regulatory-reform-act-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/enterprise-and-regulatory-reform-act-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 09:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry French</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company & Commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blasermills.co.uk/?p=9134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act introduces key changes to the legal framework for directors' remuneration in quoted companies.
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On 2nd May 2013 the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 was published having received Royal Assent on 25th April.</strong></p>
<p>The Act amends the Companies Act 2006 and introduces the following key changes to the legal framework for directors&#8217; remuneration in quoted companies:</p>
<ul>
<li>The directors&#8217; remuneration report must include a separate forward-looking policy part;</li>
<li>The policy part must be approved by ordinary resolution at least every three years;</li>
<li>The policy part must be approved before the expiry of the three-year period if the company wishes to change the policy or the shareholders did not approve the advisory vote on the non-policy part of the directors&#8217; remuneration report at the company&#8217;s previous AGM;</li>
<li>The company is prohibited from making a remuneration or loss of office payment to a current, former or future director, unless it is consistent with the most recently approved remuneration policy;</li>
<li>Any payment which is inconsistent with an approved policy will be held by the recipient in trust and can be recovered by way of a derivative action. Directors who authorised the payment will be liable for any loss to the company unless they can demonstrate that they acted honestly and reasonably.</li>
</ul>
<p>Please contact our <a href="http://www.blasermills.co.uk/how-can-we-help/in-business/company-and-commercial/">Company &amp; Commercial</a> team for further advice &#8211; <a href="mailto:commercial@blasermills.co.uk">commercial@blasermills.co.uk</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blasermills.co.uk/enterprise-and-regulatory-reform-act-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
